Sheila Jocelyn Shaw RE: COMPLAINTS REGARDING INTENTIONAL OMISSION AND PRE EXISTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE PATERNAL DAD REPORTED TO THE COURT THE DOMESTIC IOLENCE PETITION WAS DENIED BY JUDGE SALLY VEST, WHKNOWLEDGE OF ALL PRECEEDING COURT ACTIONS INCLUDING CONCURRENT CASE ACTIVITIES AT THE TIME OF THE CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION, FL STATEEMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE HEREOF CONCEALED THIS INFORMATION OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPACT TO INTENTIONALLY BIAS THE JUDGE IN ADDITION TO FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING IN A SUBSEQUENT JUVENILE HEARING AFTER THE INITIAL HEARING WAS NHEARD AND DISMISSED ON THE CALENDER DATE OF 01/28/2011 EXACTLY ONE DAY PRIOR TO THE MINOR ISIS SHAW A PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS BEING HEARD. INTENTIONAL HARASSMENT EXTENDING FROM FAMILY THEREOF THE PARENTS HAS BEEN A PATTERN OF CONDUCT INCLUDING MULTIPLE ACTS OF OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOR --- On Fri, 12/30/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: public officer, state employees misconduct (FL DEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES EMPLOYEES IN DIVISIONS FOR CHILDRENS LEGAL SERVICES, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING CONTINUED VIOLENCEBY EXINTIMATE PARTNERS INVOLVING MINORS, VAWA, y harassment, interference with parental rights and visitation interference, fraud to commit acts of violence under color of law, > To: "county ombudsman" , "Federal Ombudsman" , "OIGombudsman@oig.usda.gov" , "Ombudsman@dos.state.fl.us" > Date: Friday, December 30, 2016, 9:23 AM > CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES/CONTINUING > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALIENATION OF AFFECTION FROM THE MINOR TO > CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS AND HER SIBLINGS, MATERNAL FAMILY > TIES BY WILLIAMS > BASED ON PRIOR RETALIATORTY TORTIOUS FRAUD TO DEFAME THE > NATURAL PARENT AND MOTHER > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > > RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 > https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL > Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the > scope of cause f action by the Office > of the Inspector General within the Florida Department Of > Children. > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL > titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. > Stat. § 775.085) > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Sheila Shaw > wrote: concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT > :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM > BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition > for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to > establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss > paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on > paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support > entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 > Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to > establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 > Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing > 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff > petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 > > > INFORMS THE FLORIDA BARATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM > (ACAP)WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX > YEARS,THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE > VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: > > IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH:http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD4-8 > MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSIONRULE 4-8.4 > MISCONDUCTTHAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 > AGAINSTSHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY > TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATEDAT:Juvenile Division > 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300Orlando, FL 32806PROCEEDING > WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE, THAT FRAUD TO > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE, AND THROUGHOUT THE DURATION > OF PROCEEDINGS ATTORNEY DECEITOCCURRED INCLUDINGINTENTIONAL > CONCEALMENT OF THE FACTS REGARDING CONCURRENT CASE ACTIVITY > FOR CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AND RECOVERY OF CHILD SUPPORT > ARREARAGES WERE ONGOING IN THE MONTH DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, > DIVISIONS 42 & 38, CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AGAINST HARRIS > DESHAUN WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ AND HAD BEEN > ONGOING FOR SEVERAL YEARS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF ENTRY INTO > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS AS OF FEBRUARY 3, 2011, ALSO > THE DATE OF WHICH FRAUD WAS COMMITED, FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT > ISIS SHAW AND MICHYL SHAW WERE ALLEGEDLY MISSING. > ALLEGATIONS NEVER SPOKEN AGAIN IN ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS > VERIFIABLE BY COURT RECORD OF MINUTES OF THE COURT THAT NO > REFERENCE OF SUPPORTIVE AFFIDAVITS, NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES HAD > BEEN ENTERED INTO COURT, RATHER A CONTINUATION OF UNFOUNDED > HARASSMENT INITIATED NOT BY THE PATERNAL DAD'S BUT THROUGH > MISCONDUCT OF FLORIDA DCF CHILD PROTECTION INVESTIGATOR > DIVISION.IT IS FURTHER NOTES THAT MULTIPLE EMPLOYEE > MISCONDUCTOCCURRED CONCEALING THE MISCONDUCT BY A DCF > EMPLOYEE. > > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221WAYNE STARRANTHONY SOSGUARDIA AD LITEM > CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498AMANDA ETZKORN 25942CEDRIC > TIBONDORIS MACKEYHeather Morcroft (Appellate Atty)20 n > Orange AveSte 700 Orlando 32801FBN 0709859407-325-3585 > > > Attorney for Jarrid D. WilliamsCarlos Alberto Gonzalez > > Bar Number:656755 > Mail Address:Wayne Starr P.A.PO Box 560206Orlando, FL > 32856-0206United StatesOffice: > 407-228-7280Fax:407-228-4296Email:waynestarr@cfl.rr.com > Personal Bar URL:www.floridabar.org/mybar profile/656755 > vCard: > County:Orange > Circuit:9 > Admitted:05/15/1987 > 10-Year Discipline History:None > > Law School:Stetson UniversityCollege of Law, 1986 > > > > Thank you for> contacting the Attorney General's Office > regarding> ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL > NONSUPPORT . Our> staff will process it as soon as > possible and, if necessary,> respond appropriately. We > appreciate hearing from concerned> citizens such as > yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of> the activities > of this office, you may wish to consider a> subscription > to our electronic newsletter Weekly> Briefing. Or > perhaps> our Consumer> Alerts. Should you wish to> > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit> > oursubscription> page.> > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED> AGAINST> RUSSELL > SCOTT> HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire=> Retained> > 407-786-2889(> 1110 Douglas> Ave> AltamonteSprings, > FL> 32714> (407)> 786-2889> http://www.russellhlaw.com> > > > > ATTORNEY> MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & > CHILD SUPPORT> RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD > SUPPORT COLLECTION> LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING> JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW> VIOLATIONS> > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/> > > > Duty to report> misconduct; code > of>conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > > > > > ( TORT LAW: A tort is a> civil > wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not> > created by contract for which monetary redress > isprovided.> This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. > Moreformally, a> tort may be defined as a wrongful act or > omission arising in> the course of social re ships other > than contracts which> violates a person's legally > protected rights for which> the law provides a remedy in > the form of an action for> damages.> > > There > are two basic> classifications of torts: (a) negligence > which is the result> of an unintentional act (b) > intentional acts or omissions> which results in a breach > of someone's rights. There is> a third group in this area > that should be explained. It is> referred to as strict > liability.)> > > > > > > 8-2.241 > > > > Civil Laws Governing Law> Enforcement > Misconduct > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE> FOR THE > PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD.> 827.03 Abuse, > aggravated> abuse, and neglect of a > child;penalties.—> > >intentional act that> > could reasonably be expected to result in physical or > mental> injury to > a child;> or > (c) Active > encouragement> of any person to commit an act that > results or could> reasonably be > expected to result > in> physical or mental injury to a child. > A person > who knowingly or> willfully abuses a child without > causing great bodily> harm,> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: professional> > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, > ethnic>biasness and duty to report misconduct by attorney > of> judicial misconduct> > > signed and filed a > valid> declaration of paternity that has the force and > effect of> a judgment, enforceable by contempt> > REQUIREMENT OF> STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO > IMPROVEEFFECTIVENESS> OF CHILD SUPPORTENFORCEMENT> > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666]> (a) In order to > satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must> have in > effect laws requiring the use of the following> > procedures, consistent with this section and with> > regulations of the Secretary, to increase the > effectiveness> of the program which the State administers > under this> part:> > > > > Sec. 466. [42 > U.S.C. 666]> (a> > > (C) Voluntary paternity> > acknowledgment.—> > > (iv) Use of paternity> > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must > requirethe> State to develop and use an affidavit for the > voluntary> acknowledgment of paternity which includes the > minimum> requirements of the affidavit specified by the > Secretary> under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary > acknowledgment of> paternity, and to give fullfaith and > credit to suchan> affidavit signed in any other State > according to its> procedures.> > > > THERE > HAS BEEN A BREACH> OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS > ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD> HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE > DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD> SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL > SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED> THAT THE > UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING> > BREACH(ES) > the 1996 reforms require> States to adopt > laws that give the CSE agency authority to> initiate a > series of expedited procedures without the> necessity of > obtaining an order from any other> administrative agency > or judicial tribunal> > > and> > > > > > > > The Violence> Against Women Act of 1994 > (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus> Consolidated Appropriations > Act> > > > > and > > > > > > MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER> STATE > AND FEDERAL LAW> > > You cannot use> information > available to you because of your job, but> not > > available to the public,> for your personal benefit or > for the benefit of> others. > § 112.313(8), Fla.> > Stat.> > > Title VI allows persons> to file > administrative complaints with the federal> departments > and agencies that provide financial assistance> alleging > discrimination based on race, color, or national> origin > by recipients of federal funds.> Under Title VI, EPA has > a> responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being > used> to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, > or> national origin. This prohibition against > discrimination> under Title VI has been a statutory > mandate since 1964 and> EPA has hadTitle VI regulations > since 1973.> EPA's Office of Civil> Rights is > responsible for the Agency's administration of> Title VI, > including investigation of such ...> > > A > registered support> order is confirmed and immediately > enforceable unless the> respondent files an objection in > a record within a fixed> period of time, almost > invariably the 20 days suggested> originally, Sections > 603 and 607.> Section> 604. > > > > > > TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND> 654, 657 COLLECTION AND > DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE> FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US > CODE> § 657. Distributionof> collected support> > > > > > The following is an> abstract from > the Administration for Children and> Families' website > and the Administration for Child> Support Enforcement, > both of whichpublish all statutory> guidelines for the > collection of child support and payments> thereof to > therecipient.> collection and> distribution of child > support payments Within this site it> is defined as > follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child> Support > Collection/Distribution For answers to questions> about > your own case, you need to check with your local or> > state child support office. State CSE agency telephone> > numbers and addresses are at> (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/> > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm> (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/> > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency > web> site links are on our web site at the following> > location:> http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/> > programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general> > information may be helpful: If the state collects more in > a> month than is to be paid to the family for their > current and> past due support, the rest of the money can > be usedto repay> thestate and federal governments for > cash assistance * AFDC> or TANF * that a family received. > Also, child support> agencies can recover all or part of > the costs of their> services from people who are not in a > cash assistance> program. These can include the cost of > legal work done by> agency attorneys or the costs of > locating a parent, for> example. The money may be > deducted from the child support> payment, or it may be > collected from the noncustodial> parent. For more > information on changes in the law and how> they may > affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices> of > your State, you should contact your State child support> > enforcement agency.> > > > > > > Case > Type: Paternity> DOR> Date Filed:> 08/29/2005> > Location: Div> 42> Judicial Officer: Evans,> Robert > M> > > > Uniform CaseNumber:> 482005DR014270A001OX> > > > Related Case Information> Related Cases> > 2002-DR-006249-O> (Paternity)> Party> > Information> > > Lead> Attorneys> Petitioner > SHAW, SHEILA> JOCELYN BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) > JONES,> Esquire> Retained> 407-849-1133(W)> > > > Respondent GONZALEZ,> CARLOS ALBERTO> > > > Events & Orders of> the Court DISPOSITIONS> > 05/15/2012> Order Denying (Judicial>Officer: Evans, > Robert M)> > > > > > > Tuesday, June 18,> 2013 12:39 PM> Subject: > ATTORNEY> GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz > Russell S> Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 > Douglas Ave> Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) > 786-2889> http://www.russellhlaw.com> > > > > > > > > Thankyou for> contacting the Attorney > General's Office regarding> ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING > CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our> staff will process it as soon > as possible and, if necessary,> respond appropriately. We > appreciate hearing from concerned> citizens such as > yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of> the activities > of this office, you may wish to consider a> subscription > to our electronic newsletter Weekly> Briefing. Or > perhaps> our Consumer> Alerts. Should you wish to> > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit> > oursubscription> page.> > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED> AGAINST> RUSSELL > SCOTT> HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire=> Retained> > 407-786-2889(> 1110 Douglas> Ave> Altamonte > Springs, FL> 32714> (407)>786-2889>http://www.russellhlaw.com> > > > > ATTORNEY> MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & > CHILD SUPPORT> RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD > SUPPORT COLLECTION> LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING> JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW> VIOLATIONS> > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/> > > > Duty to report> misconduct; code of> > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > > > > Edit with the Docs appMake tweaks, leave comments, and share > with others to edit at the same time.NO THANKSUSE THE > APPACAP ATTY COMPLAINT 112,FRAUD ON THE > COURTINQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORMATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE > FLORIDABARTHESPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT > ARE:THE FLORIDA BARATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM651 > EAST JEFFERSON STREETTALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300ON THIS > 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015SHEILA JOCELYN SHAWPO BOX 5147, TAMPA, > FLORIDA 33657-5175PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT:AGAINST THE > ATTORNEY(S)FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221WAYNE > STARRANTHONY SOSGUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ > 667498AMANDA ETZKORN 25942CEDRIC TIBONDORIS MACKEYHeather > Morcroft (Appellate Atty)20 n Orange AveSte 700 Orlando > 32801FBN 0709859407-325-3585INFORMS THE FLORIDA > BARATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP)WITHIN THE > TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS,THAT THE > FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET > FORTH:http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD4-8 > MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THEPROFESSIONRULE 4-8.4 > MISCONDUCTTHAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 > AGAINSTSHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY > TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:Juvenile > Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300Orlando, FL > 32806PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF > THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL > BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY > PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE > COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS > MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF > CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH > THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES > REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A > DECEITFULMANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE > OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL > PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE > DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF :1. A > MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE > CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A > DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN > THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED.IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS > TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)CONTINUATION OF > PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE > ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; > Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and > white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children > Report is Required and is found to be absent in all > proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for > fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSINGCHILDRENS > REPORT REQUIREDWHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THECOMMENCEMENT OF > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD.TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD > INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO > CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSETHE ATTORNEY’S TO > CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND > DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF > DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO > THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE > NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA > STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDRENTHE > DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL > PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, > ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.Civil contempt is conduct directed > against the rights of the opposing party.law-imposed > obligation ;"an act or omission tending to > obstructorinterfere with the orderly administration of > justice, or to impair thedignity of the court or respect for > its authority. There are twokinds, direct and constructive." > 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contemptopenly and in the > presence of the court, resists the power of thecourt, 102 A. > 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contemptresults > from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply > withorders.The basic standards governing fraud on the court > are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. > Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):The requisite > fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, > clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in > motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere > with the judicial system’s ability impartially > toadjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of > fact or unfairly hampering the presentation ofthe opposing > party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 > F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has > the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound > judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff > has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party > refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, > 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).The types of issues > raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded intothe > following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel > (failureto object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, > failure to callwitnesses, failure to cross-examine, and > failure to object to denialof a continuance notion), trial > court errors (failure to suppressimproper evidence, improper > jury instructions), (failure to disclose,use of perjured > testimony, andinflammatory summation), 4th > amendment(unlawful arrest), 5th amendmentCorporate and > CriminalFraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven > sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and > Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes > specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or > alteration of financial records or other interference with > investigations, while providing certain protections for > whistleblowers.cc:(http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD)A > lawyer shall not:(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules > of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another > to do so, or do so through the acts of another;(b) commit a > criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's > honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other > respects;(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, > deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not > beprofessional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal > lawenforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others > about or to supervise another in an undercover > investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it > shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed > in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law > enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an > undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or > rule;(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice > of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, > including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, > disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, > jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any > basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, > ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, > marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic > status, employment, or physical characteristic;(e) state or > imply an ability toinfluence improperlya government agency > or official or to achieve results by means that violate the > Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;(f) knowingly > assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a > violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other > law;(g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry > by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined > elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is > conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A > written response shall be made:(1) within 15 days of the > date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar > counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors;(2) > within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written > investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, > or board of governors;(3) within the time stated in any > subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar > (withoutadditional time allowed for mailing);(4) asprovided > in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the > referee in matters assigned to a referee; and(5) as provided > in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the > Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that > court.Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable > rules, all times for response shall be calculated as > provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar > and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the > disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good > cause shown.Failure to respond to an official inquiry with > no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and > processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules > Regulating The Florida Bar.(h) willfully refuse, as > determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely > pay a child support obligation; or(i) engage in sexual > conduct witha client or a representative of a client that > exploitsor adversely affects the interests of the client or > the lawyer-client relationship.If the sexual conduct > commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it > shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or > adversely affects the interests of the client or the > lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this > presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence > that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect > the interests of the client or the lawyer-client > relationship.The prohibition and presumption stated in this > rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another > lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the > sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to > the client and is screened from access to the file > concerning the legal representation.CommentLawyers are > subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to > violate the Rules ofProfessional Conduct, knowinglyassist or > induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of > another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so > on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not > prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action > the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the > client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of > Professional Conduct.Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect > adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses > involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file > an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry > no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was > drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That > concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some > matters of personal morality, such as adultery and > comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to > fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is > personallyanswerableto the entirecriminal law, a lawyer > should be professionally answerable only for offenses that > indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law > practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of > trust, or serious interference with the administration of > justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated > offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered > separately, canindicate indifference to legal obligation.A > lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by > law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation > exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good > faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or > application of the law apply to challenges of legal > regulation of the practice of law.Subdivision (c) recognizes > instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies > or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise > others in undercover investigations,and provides an > exception to allowthe activity without the lawyer engaging > in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges > current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the > exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to > rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows > the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited > by law or rule.Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes > conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of > justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against > discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while > performing duties in connection with the practice of law. > The proscription extends to any characteristic or status > that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual > issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards > litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other > lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, > national origin, disability, marital status, > sexualorientation,age, socioeconomic status, employment, > physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the > administration of justice and undermines the public's > confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of > equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from > representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, > such as, by way ofexample, representing a client accused of > committing discriminatory conduct.Lawyers holding public > office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of > other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can > suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of > attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private > trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or > agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or > other organization.A lawyer's obligation to respond to an > inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated insubdivision (g) > of this rule andsubdivision(h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While > response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or > assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any > disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A > response containing a proper invocation thereof is > sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This > obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient > operation of the disciplinary system.Subdivision (h) of this > rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys > who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other > professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance > with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. > That section provides for the suspension or denial of a > professional license due to delinquent child support > payments after all other available remedies for the > collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, > subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as > theprimary meansfor collecting child support, but should be > used only after all other available remedies for the > collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a > grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated > under this subdivision, the court that entered the child > support order must first make a finding of willful refusal > to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this > rule includes both domestic(Florida) and out-of-state > (URESA) child support obligations, as well as > arrearages.Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the > client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of > commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client > relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual > relationship that exploits that trust compromises the > lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to > exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of > clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has > the capacityto impair the exerciseof that judgment.FALSE > STATEMENTS MISCONDUCT FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW > ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT LEGAL PHILANTHROPY > MISUSE OF OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE LEGAL ABUSE > LAWYER MISCONDUCT ETHNIC BIASEDNESS MOCKERY TRIAL ERROR > INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL > NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, > FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONSTHAT ON THE ONSET OF > PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINSTSHEILA SHAW, AS THE > DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE > COUNTY LOCATED AT:Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan > St.Suite 300Orlando, FL 32806PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE > HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINALBACKGROUNDS, AND > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION > 42 COURT,VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE > ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL > REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL > CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF :1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE > PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT > APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE > ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) > OCCURRED.THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE > TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE > THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVESHOWING OF FINANCIAL > SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THEESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP > WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED > REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF > PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING > TO CHILDRENTHE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL > PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL > MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING > VIOLATIONS: > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.Civil contempt is conduct directed > against the rights of the opposing party.law-imposed > obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct > orinterfere with the orderly administration of justice, or > to impair thedignity of the court or respect for its > authority. There are twokinds, direct and constructive." 249 > S. 2d 127, 128. direct contemptopenly and in the presence of > thecourt, resists the power of thecourt, 102 A. 400, 406; > and consequential, or constructive contemptresults > frommatters outside the court, such as failure to comply > withorders.The basic standards governing fraud on the court > are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. > Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):The requisite > fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, > clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in > motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere > with the judicial system’s ability impartially to > adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of > fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing > party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 > F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has > the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound > judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff > has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party > refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v.Schneider, > 609 So. 2d138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).The types of issues > raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded intothe > following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel > (failureto object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, > failure to callwitnesses, failure to cross-examine, and > failure to object to denialof a continuance notion), trial > court errors (failure to suppressimproper evidence, improper > jury instructions), (failure to disclose,use of perjured > testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th > amendment(unlawful arrest), 5th amendmentCorporate and > Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven > sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and > Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes > specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or > alteration offinancial records or other interference with > investigations, while providing certain protections > forwhistleblowers.cc:Letter regarding fraud on the > court,absent administrative remedy or action in a timely > manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as > unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal > act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist > avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in > violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action > was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child > support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, > Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42.Sent: Tuesday, > June 18, 2013 12:39 PMSubject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT > FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: > Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.comThank you for contacting the > Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEYMISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff > will processit as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. > Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe > to either, or both, publications, please visit our > subscription page. > COMPLAINT FILED AGAINSTRUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, > Esquire=Retained 407-786-2889(1110 Douglas AveAltamonte > Springs, FL 32714(407) 786-2889http://www.russellhlaw.com > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & > CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT > COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, > ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORTLAW > VIOLATIONShttp://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/Theduty > to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on > attorneys in the United States by the rules governing > professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an > attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or > a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of > e...Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https://www.facebook.com/OrangClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228( > TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation > of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary > redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an > omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful > act or omission arising in the course of social re ships > other than contracts which violates a person's legally > protected rights forwhich the law provides a remedy in the > form of an action for damages.There are two basic > classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result > of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions > which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a > third group in this area that should be explained. It is > referred to as strict liability.)8-2.241Civil Laws Governing > Law Enforcement MisconductBUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE > PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD.827.03 Abuse, aggravated > abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.—intentional act > that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or > mental injury toa child; or(c) Active encouragement of any > person to commit an act that results or could reasonably > beexpected to result in physical or mental injury to a > child.A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child > without causing great bodily harm,Subject:professional > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic > biasedness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of > judicial misconductsigned and filed a valid declaration of > paternity that has the force and effect of a judgment, > enforceable by contemptREQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED > PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT > ENFORCEMENTSec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy > section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws > requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent > with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to > increase the effectiveness of the program which the State > administers under this part:Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a(C) > Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.—(iv) Use of paternity > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the > State to develop and use anaffidavit for the voluntary > acknowledgment of paternity which includesthe minimum > requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary > under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of > paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an > affidavit signed in any other State according to its > procedures. > THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS > ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY > IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT > IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS ARE > ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES)the 1996 reforms > require States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency > authority to initiate a series of expedited procedures > without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other > administrative agency or judicial tribunalandThe Violence > Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus > Consolidated Appropriations ActandMISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER > STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > You cannot use information available to you because of your > job, but notavailable to the public, for your personal > benefit or for the benefit of others. > > > 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.Title VI > > 4078363000 > Florida Department of Corrections > 501 South Calhoun Street > Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500 > (850) 717-3444 > FAX: (850) 487-4427 > E-Mail: co-supervision@mail.dc.state.fl.us > 407-836-3652 > ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA > PO > ERICKA SEAMAN > RE: complaints of domestic violence, parental alienation, > fraud on the court, child abuse, VAWA > complaint was made against JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS > REGARDING MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHUANA C. J. SHAW > 4135 KIRKLAND BLVD, ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32810 > THE REPORT WAS MADE TO JARRID D. WILLIAM’S COUNTY > PROBATION OFFICER > FOR WHICH JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS IS CURRENTLY ON COUNTY > PROBATION FOR DUI WITH A MINOR, MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHAUNA C. > J. SHAW > Complaint foregoes that Jarrid Deshaun Williams has been > reported to the Florida Department of > Children & Families on several incidents including child > abuse, neglect, fraud, violence against > women & children in addition to such an “outrageous” > pattern of violence towards the child’s > mother, Sheila Jocelyn Shaw, whereas the as the paternal > party to the child custody case andchild support case > registered in Orange County, Jarrid Deshaun Williams was > instructed to > comply with THE PARENTAL RIGHTS OF SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW & > VISITATION > WITH THE MINOR of which Jarrid Deshaun Williams through the > course of this period has > abused the court order and is now in contempt of court by > illustrating child concealment, false > statements in the community against the mother, defamation > and as previously stated child abuse > by parental alienation. Mr. Williams’ conduct was reported > to the probation officer regarding the > criminal activities involved including criminal enterprising > and faith based violence including > fraud to block the child’s reunification with the mother, > in addition to continued acts of violence > which has been reported to law enforcement. The misconduct > or negligence by the public > officer(s) involving family ties has been the problem > throughout the case including attorney > misconduct and Florida Department of Families and Children > Employee Misconduct including > once again identification problems as to the “role” or > “duties” in preventing further criminal > activities by Jarrid Deshaun Williams in preinvestigation > and ongoing investigations supplied to > the courts in Orange County. Violation of Conduct or > Professional Standards > Duty of conduct- willful, intentional knowledge of the > course of action or lack of action would > result in further domestic violence or intentional > misconduct that was meant to cause economic > torts. > Jarrid Deshaun Williams is a habitual drug substance abuse > offender. > Court Documentation states: > ORANGE COUNTY COURT CASE HISTORIES THE LATER OF THE CASES > WAS > HEARD BY Judge: Tanya Davis Wilson, > Case Type: Criminal Traffic > Date Filed: 1/4/2015 Location Orlando - TR UCN: > 482015CT000044000AOX > 1/3/2015 OBTS:8 Sequence:1 Control Number:201500003938 > Arresting Agency:Orlando > Police Department 1. CT-DUI WITH MINOR IN CAR OR BAL OF .20 > OR HIGHER > Statute: 316.193(4) First Degree - Misd > 1 2000-TR-011927 > -A-W > STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID > DESHAUN WILLIAMS > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > W Michael > Miller > 02/03/20 > 00 > 2 2008-TR-154128 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID > DESHAUN WILLIAMS > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 09/15/20 > 08 > 3 2009-TR-035184 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID > DESHAUN WILLIAMS > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 03/19/4 2010-TR-161844 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 11/17/20 > 10 > 5 2011-TR-018263 > -A-W > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 95 Hearing > Officer > 05/10/20 > 11 > 6 2012-TR-029701 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 03/07/20 > 12 > 7 2013-TR-072280 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 06/10/20 > 13 > 8 2013-TR-072282 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 06/10/20 > 13 > 9 2013-TR-078400 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > 98 Hearing > Officer > 06/15/20 > 13 > 10 2015-CT-000044 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Criminal > Traffic > 08/20/19 > 70 > Tanya > Davis > Wilson > 01/04/20 > 15 > 11 2015-TR-003700 > -A-O > STATE OF FLORIDA vs. > WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN > Civil Traffic > Infraction > 08/20/19 > 70 > Tanya > Davis > Wilson > 01/08/20 > 15 > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/